// you’re reading...

Essays

Once Superheroes: Part I

Disclose to another Christian that the Garden of Eden was merely a myth and they’ll pray for God to absolve you of blasphemy. Convey that it’s hard for you to presuppose The Fall was a literal chain of events and most likely, some other “discerning” Christian will question the integrity of your salvation. We are taught that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, which I believe. But a slightly more complicated issue is the one of questioning the literal aspects of this story or that. Maybe you’ve already encountered one of those Christians. Maybe, you are one of those Christians. Maybe you’re not a Christian because you have emerging questions concerning these doctrines. Whatever your situation, subjects like these are always hard to answer and harder to defend; because my ostensible hypothesis is this: you won’t be contending for the faith with nonbelievers, no…your war will be with fellow believers who are absolutely certain that their opinion is more valid than yours.

I’m not here to drown myself in a massive altercation with fundamentalists concerning this point of doctrine or any other. The point of this writing is to expose you to my own questions concerning spirituality which have risen like flowers along the (dare I say it?) narrow path to Christ (such a cliché). And though most of the ideas presented in this series will seem rather neoteric, I assure you that any original idea I may posit is more than likely built upon the ideas of one C.S. Lewis, taken from his book, The Problem Of Pain.

For Me, This Is The Beginning

The Problem of PainIf you have read Mr. Lewis’ (in my opinion) opus, or if you plan to — you’ll find that the ideas I present here to be out of chronological sync with the book. My reason for starting with the doctrine of The Fall is because it was in that chapter that I realized why I was depressed. This chapter was a revelation that opened my eyes to all the minor revelations that had come before it. And though these ideas are merely theories and not indisputable fact, we must remember that there isn’t one single fact presented in the entire Bible that isn’t disputable. Speak loud enough for a length of time and you’ll find some Christian, somewhere, who will be more than happy to tell you that you’re wrong and that unless you repent of your erroneous doctrine, you will find yourself on the other side of eternity with only the flames of hell lapping up the flesh of your soul.

With that being said, I want you, dear reader, to understand that what I’m purporting is merely my own humble understanding concerning a story and a subject that I am (as we all are) incapable of understanding completely. My theories, as wrong as they may be, are based on my understanding of Scripture, C.S. Lewis’ writings and my God-given mind. I do not and will not ever declare these thoughts to be revered as doctrine; because the fact is, I cry in my pillow at night for a God that rarely answers me in an audible voice indistinguishable from the thoughts inside my head.

Everything is open to discussion. Reasonable debate is welcomed. But do not approach this subject with nothing more than the “Bible tells me so” fallacy. Yes, the Bible tells us a lot of things and I praise God for that. But the Bible also says nothing concerning more subjects than not. And in this particular subject, where even the most Christian of scholars will disagree on any given point, I feel that the Garden of Eden is fair game for hypothesis and questioning. My salvation does not hinge on my acceptance of the traditional view concerning this doctrine, but I am required to work out my faith with fear and trembling.

Believe me when I say that write with fear. I postulate with trembling.

What You Can Expect

Starting with the next post, I’ll begin to cover as many topics as possible concerning The Fall, human suffering, depression, and other subjects riddled throughout C.S. Lewis’ book as well as my own ideas concerning these matters. For example, Lewis asserts that the story of the Garden is yes, a myth and he presents many valid and reasonable theories for why it is so rather than literal truth. On top of Lewis’ thoughts concerning the matter, I will suppose that a myth can still be a myth and still encompass the entire truth of the matter.

TransfigurationI’ll eventually go further and assert that such a traumatic event like the dissociation of the human race from the spirit of God would result in some kind of PTSD or other disorder for the entire human race, leaving us in a state where we are physically, psychologically, and genetically unable to handle the truth of the matter, leaving us only the possibility of a story that would provide clues which would enable us to determine a need for a savior.

We’ll talk about how we were once superheroes, unconstrained by the laws of nature; about transfigurations and emptiness and the possible meaning behind it all.

Will anything that I write be absolute truth? Of course not. It’s probably so off base that God is laughing with Jesus and the Holy Spirit right now…”Hey Guys! You gotta read this!” But since God (and the Bible) seem rather silent on the matter, it’s only our nature to wonder and theorize and cope with the pain that pulsates with such force to the very tips of our fingers. Your theories are as good as mine, but they’re not any better. In the meantime, we’ll talk until the day comes and all will be made known. Paul said in Corinthians 13 that “I know in part and prophesy in part.” None of us, not a single one, understands everything the Bible is or isn’t saying. But it is our job to search for the answers. To try and understand who we are, where we’ve come from and how God fits into all of it.

So welcome to my search. You’re in for a ride.

Discussion

7 comments for “Once Superheroes: Part I”

  1. Gravatar

    Ok, I’m going back to read this one again. Right after my other 29 books that I’m in the process of reading… :) So it might be a while - I gleefully (sarcasm mine) await your next post. Take care

    Posted by Emilie | September 19, 2007, 10:33 pm
  2. Gravatar

    I just got back to reading your blogs. Just finished catching up. It was good. Thanks for the comment towards Chance (and myself) about writing. I’ve been thinking of updating our website to me more like a journal, I just…haven’t gotten there yet, and I’m not sure about some of the technical part of it. Chance has started a restaurant blog…and I’ve been fairly dormant.

    I haven’t read this Clive Staples classic but…I might give it a try. Every time I start one of his ‘adult books’ I get about 1/3 of the way through and can’t take the language anymore. I enjoy children’s books…5th grade reading level is about appropriate for me, I think. But I might try.

    I’m excited about this series. I’m sorry about your summer. I can kinda understand. Usually for me it’s just a different time of year. Your writing time.

    Posted by Claire | September 21, 2007, 1:15 pm
  3. Gravatar

    Hey Zach, good to see you writing again. I look forward to reading your thoughts on this. It’s only been the last year / 18 months I’ve been questioning & challenging my traditional understandings of some of the stories in the bible. I guess you will probably have read Brian Maclaren’s books in the New Kind of Christian series?

    Posted by Rich D | September 22, 2007, 2:55 am
  4. Gravatar

    @Emilie - I’m glad.

    @Claire - You’re welcome. I don’t know what your site is like now, but we could either add a journal to it or build a new site and import all the old data into it. There are options. Also, this particular C.S. Lewis book is a very hard read. I put it down for months before pushing myself to finish it. But after I did, it was well worth it.

    @Rich - Glad to see you man. I haven’t read Maclaren’s books, but my pastor has and a lot of my friends as well. I’ll eventually read him myself, but I’m not in a hurry. I seem to be on a similar page as Mr. Maclaren, which leads me to believe that more and more of our generation is tired of the same old crap.

    Posted by Johnny Beloved | September 22, 2007, 10:35 am
  5. Gravatar

    Zach, love your thoughts. I couldn’t help think of something I read this week. The Waco paper has pulled the article from their website but if your not careful you’ll be next (laughing). Below is what I could find.

    Bill Nye, the harmless children’s edu-tainer known as “The Science Guy,” managed to offend a select group of adults in Waco, Texas at a presentation, when he suggested that the moon does not emit light, but instead reflects the light of the sun.

    As even most elementary-school graduates know, the moon reflects the light of the sun but produces no light of its own.But don’t tell that to the good people of Waco, who were “visibly angered by what some perceived as irreverence,” according to the Waco Tribune. Nye was in town to participate in McLennan Community College’s Distinguished Lecture Series. He gave two lectures on such unfunny and adult topics as global warming, Mars exploration, and energy consumption. But nothing got people as riled as when he brought up Genesis 1:16, which reads: “God made two great lights — the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.”The lesser light, he pointed out, is not a light at all, but only a reflector. At this point, several people in the audience stormed out in fury. One woman yelled “We believe in God!” and left with three children, thus ensuring that people across America would read about the incident and conclude that Waco is as nutty as they’d always suspected.

    Posted by McCool | September 22, 2007, 10:53 am
  6. Gravatar

    Chris, I read that article. And considering what passes for a “museum” in the fair city of Waco, stories like this are not a far stretch.

    Here’s a thought. If we are Christians, and as Christians believe that God made everything we can see, feel, touch, what are we so afraid of? If God truly exists in nature, (like we believe he exists in our hearts and souls and minds), then wouldn’t science and the continued pursuit of it eventually lead us back to our Maker?

    Scientists will admit that for everything we do know, there are thousands of things we don’t know. Science is young, and though we’re making great strides that are seemingly leading us away from any belief of a higher power, we as Christians should not be afraid of any discovery that science might produce.

    In the end, one of two things will happen. Irrefutable proof will show that God in fact, does not exist. Or irrefutable proof will show that God does exist, much to the chagrin of atheists everywhere. In the meantime, today, when there is still doubt, we all have a choice to make. We believe in God or we don’t. Everything is up in the air and will be for quite some time.

    Science can’t produce anything that will shake your faith, or my faith because we have nothing to be afraid of. Of course, Waco is a different matter. It happens to scare the crap out of me.

    Posted by Johnny Beloved | September 22, 2007, 12:28 pm
  7. Gravatar

    I need to read more of Lewis. Problem is, I can only digest about one paragraph at a time. Good stuff, though.

    Waco is indeed full of screwballs. Thankfully, my year and a half there didn’t scar me permanently.

    Posted by Sara | September 26, 2007, 9:21 pm

Post a comment