I have a friend who is agnostic in a sense, surmising that yes, there is a God; but disbelieving that this God is the Christian God. Despite having been raised as a Christian, his mind concludes that the story of Jesus is a very nice story, but not necessary. He is (my friend) absolutely sure that Jesus lived, that he was an extraordinary man, but not a God. No, the resurrection is nothing more than a story certain friends told each other to keep the memory of an unparalleled man alive by capitalizing on a myth already present in Jewish culture (the Messiah).
But the fact remains that most Christians (and nonbelievers as well) don’t fully grasp why stories like the Garden of Eden and the Resurrection are necessary. Non-Christians think the Bible is just mostly little fables that Jewish men and women told their kids at bedtime to impress morality into their young molding minds. Many Christians, (especially the ones converted from childhood), blindly accept these stories without a second thought. “This is God’s Word,” they’ll tell you, like it’s the end of the matter. But what they fail to realize is that it’s only the end of the matter in their own minds, not in the minds of others. Which presents a conundrum for a lot of believers (like myself) that just have to make some frigging sense out of simple stories presented in the Bible. If it’s all we’re left with, then so be it. But don’t say that I must accept what is written like there is nothing more to be said.
Whether you’re of the opinion that stories from the Bible are allegorical or literal, it’s not hard to admit that Christians seem to spend more time arguing who is right rather than understanding (or trying to understand) what it truly means to be a “follower of Christ.” Think about it. Why is the story of Christ necessary? Because of one single infraction involving a piece of fruit? Is the story of Adam and Eve truly a story about obedience? Is it a story about free will? Is it, like the story of Lucifer, a story ultimately about pride? Let’s think on this.
The game of chess is played with great passion by enthusiasts everywhere. Chess is used as a metaphor for life, like baseball, like war. This game depends on rigidity. You are constrained by the moves of certain pieces and the strategies employed as a result of your opponent’s moves. And therein lies the brilliance of chess. The freedom of it. We relate to the game because we relate to life. But think for a moment and wonder. What if we could make any move we wanted with whatever piece we wanted? What if we could instantly take the king in a single swoop, because such a move was simply possible? The game, in that moment, would cease to be a pursuit of skill. Hell, it would even cease to be fun. No move would have great importance. Strategy would cease to exist. The game itself would become pointless.
What if God had, by some miracle within the grasp of his power, corrected that first sin? All is well again. But herein lies the dilemma. God, in his infinite wisdom, wouldn’t have corrected the first sin unless he was willing to correct the second sin, and then the third sin, and then the fourth, fifth, and ad infinitum. Our choices would therefore be rendered absolutely inane. The very foundation of the great human experiment (free will) would be corrupted, and what had started as something beautifully meaningful would be chipped apart to shards of something increasingly insubstantial by miracles of sin reversal performed by God’s own hand.
Let me sum up the previous three paragraphs in one word for you, “Lame.”
Adam and Eve
What separates Christianity from anything else? We have so many supposed ways to God, but none of them offer an explanation for the ache in the pit of our stomachs. No other religion can tell us why God doesn’t heal amputees, cure the cancer stricken and bring peace on the earth. Christianity offers a very clear reason. We’re fallen human beings.
Maybe you don’t believe in God. Maybe you think God should fix everything if such a thing truly exists. And if I’m speaking to you, I would have to say that you understand nothing about human nature. We are innately selfish, self-preserving, narcissistic creatures. When push comes to shove, we don’t sacrifice ourselves. We sacrifice the poor fool next to us. Call it evolution. Call it survival of the fittest. What you’re observing is merely pride. The time has come for one of us to die, and we’re both pointing the finger at someone else.
God doesn’t heal amputees because he doesn’t involve himself in the perpetuation nor the hinderence of our free will. We made a choice, at some point in time, to abandon God for ourselves. And though it wasn’t the choice God would have made for us, we still made it and therefore have to live with the consequences.
Christ is necessary for one reason and one reason only. It was to provide us with a choice.
I love the Matrix. It was a fascinating movie. In many ways, a representation of our current state of affairs. The movie in essence, is about choice. Humanity, through the exercise of its free will, made a decision to alienate God. We said we could handle things on our own (the details of this will only get more fascinating in later posts), and that was that. In all fairness, we should have been left to rot.
The One
But God, knowing that free will depended on the ability to choose, foretasted the future. Sooner or later mankind would have become aware of the problem, realizing that if a miracle had occurred and corrected our sin, the lack of any miracle whatsoever would have left us hopeless in our sin. The game isn’t fair when you know that no matter what you do, the consequences will remain the same. Morality, as a result, would have no meaning. And we could rape, maim and kill to our evil heart’s content knowing that no matter what we did, the result would not change. If we’re punished the same for a single lie as a thousand gruesome murders, then what? C’est la vie.
So without Christ, we have two polar opposites. On one side, we have God correcting all of our mistakes and rendering our life meaningless. On the other side, we have God abandoning us to our choices, also rendering our life meaningless. In the former scenario, we live in a bubble. In the latter, a black hole.
Jesus Christ is the very definition of fairness. When Jesus said that “I am the way, the truth and the life,” he wasn’t joking around. Jesus is the reason we still have free will. There are still consequences to be had. There are risks to be taken. Choices to be made. Even know, a great debate is being waged by Christians and Atheists alike over the validity of one choice over the other. Atheists would have you believe that the belief in a ridiculous concept like “god” is childish and delusional. This is all we have and the only difference you can make is in the here and now.
But good writers know that with every story, even the story of humanity, there must be a risk taken. There has to be the possibility at some point in the book where the conflict can affect both a wonderful or horrible ending. Atheists have no imagination. No creativity. Look at the world around you. It’s full of imagination. It’s full of creativity and wonder and excitement. It’s this way because everything has meaning. Your choices have meaning. Your faith has meaning. And even when the world looks empty and pointless and merely a shadow of its former self, remember that the story still has to come to an end. There is a lot of living between now and then.
In the meantime, we have to realize what gives balance to the world around us. Christianity and the meaning behind it offers the only viable explanation of why there is so much hurt in the world. Why there is war and confusion and hatred and pain.
God isn’t going to make us love him. He can’t. He’s bound by the very words he spoke from his mouth. It’s called a promise and if not in the physical world, something like a promise still holds weight in the spiritual world. He promised to let us choose. To always let us choose. And with every moment, we are given a choice. When you think about it, it’s the way a story is written. It keeps us guessing until the very end. No other faith can offer you a better story, a better meaning for your life.
This is not the end. No, we’re just getting started.
You need to write a “christian” book. Loved this post!
@Orrin - I don’t know if my regurgitated ideas on C.S. Lewis would be a huge bestseller. But I’m glad to know you enjoyed the post. How’s married life?
“Superheroes” is certainly a beautiful delineation. The first minute I understood Neo, I began to assimilate this in a capacity that totally astounded me. My mind raced and debated for months. It still does, years later. I had never associated it with the beginning however. This too shall surely set my inquisitive mind reeling.
You made a statement though, that has really thrown me for a loop. Really set me back in a sense. Maybe I am reading too much in to the verbiage, howbeit I must ask. You wrote, “Christ is necessary for one reason, and one reason only, it was to provide us with a choice.” I am having trouble swallowing this. It is to my understanding that the purpose of Christ, more so the reason of Christ, was to defeat spiritual death. This death caused our separation from God. Which in essence is in direct conflict for the purpose to which we where created. So the only way for us to return to our original communion with God, was for the penalty of death to be satisfied. Consequently we see the sacrifices of the Old Testament, carried into the death and resurrection (defeat of death) of Christ. Atonement, this would be my assimilation for the “reason” or one of them for Christ.
Is this what you where getting at with much fewer words? That Jesus Christ provides mankind a choice, a choice of acceptance to death, or life?
@Joshua - what I meant was that without Christ, we would be abandoned. Without Christ, and before that, the promise of Christ, we would be living in the equivalent of “Hell.” I believe that “Hell” is utter separation from God. No birthday cards, no tea times, nothing. Whether that involves literal flames of fire, I don’t know. But without Christ or the promise of his coming (which, incidentally was made immediately after the discovery of the sin), we would be living in the equivalent of a black hole. No morality, no values, no sense of wrong versus right.
If this was the case, the very foundation of the great human experiment (free will) would be flipped on its head. It is my opinion that we have standards of “good” and “evil” because God is still reaching out to us. God’s presence is still in the world, affecting both believers and non-believers. Imagine if his presence wasn’t in the world. Would we even have a concept of “good?”
The ultimatum of any good story — right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, Lord of the Rings, Narnia, Matrix, the list goes on and on — is made possible because we understand what “good” is and can be. If God had abandoned us, if God never promised a Christ, never delivered a Christ, where would we be? What choice would we truly have?
There we would be no choice. If God truly abandoned us, we wouldn’t have even a concept of “God.” We would be dead in our sins. I’ll even go so far as to say that we wouldn’t want a choice, our hearts being so engulfed with evil - similar to corresponding ideas that Lewis presented in both The Problem of Pain and The Great Divorce. I think, in the end, that what you understand to be true and what I understand to be true, go hand in hand.
Does that clarify some things?
Good post! You really touched on some thoughts I have been wrestling. First, the statement in our culture that sounds like this “There is a god, but Jesus isn’t necessary Him.” The view that “all roads lead to god, so no need for a faith belief system…no need to believe the Christ story” - That is arrogant! What they are accusing believers of is accepting an ultimate reality, but their own conviction is an ultimate reality. Second, I think the real issue is morality. Tragic but Christians (all religions) convey they are more moral, ethical, meaningful because of their faith. The truth is Christians are no better than non-Christians. We are not morally fit for God at all, in fact the Christian who really understands scripture and holds its words dear considers himself so desperately broken that unless God sent Christ to be the wrath absorbing sacrifice for our life we have no chance to be restored (Garden of Eden relationship of tranquility between man and God).
Christians continue to show we don’t understand the gospel by pretending we have more morality then everyone else (more devoted). That is why we picket stuff! The belief that we are “more” because of our faith is not the gospel of Christ or the Bible. It’s actually the enemy of the gospel. JESUS SAVES is the gospel. Or to be clearer Jesus saves us from ourselves (our past, present, and future poor choices). The message of Christ is not a religion…I truly believe that I’m not religious or apart of a religion. The motto of Religion is “I OBEY THEREFORE I AM ACCEPTED!” But the message of Christ is the opposite, He says “You Love (insert enemy here)…” It has nothing to do with obedience in exchange for acceptance and it clearly has nothing to do with morality, ethics, virtue, or saintliness. Those are all by products but not the intention of the gospel.
Adam and Eve walked among God without knowledge of Sin and the Tree opened their eyes of who they “are” therefore the reality that they are not equal, peers or heroic enough for God (nor can we alone be peers with God or heroic without God). But the biggest story is that Christ fully man without sin and fully God (on the equal, as God, and entirely heroic) took our place in the “Garden” and reconciled us into the garden relationship with God. I don’t know if the “Garden of Eden” story is true…I wasn’t there and have no living eye witnesses…I agree that the actually events of the separation of God and man is much bigger than words as much as the story of the redemption of man is too big for words.
Certainly does illuminate things, thank you. What a awesome God, that through His righteousness He is still reaching out to us.
Brings to mind a verse my Pastor pointed out. Isaiah 43:25 “I, even I, am he who blots out your transgressions, for my own sake, and remembers your sins no more.”
Mr. The Beloved, I typically don’t have time to read your post like I would like but was able to today. This is not in refference to this one exclusively but just wanted to say the blog is killer. keep it up!
Z, this was a great post and a great challenge. I can see that others don’t quite see it the way you and CS do and I’m afraid I’m in that camp. Unfortunately, because Jesus walked among us as a man there is a chronology. In fact we currently reference time that way (B.C. and A.D.) Not to be contradictory but men (humans) had choice and free will in the B.C. era. Therefore, to me, it seems the importance of Jesus is not that we have free will but Jesus shows us how to make better choices. It is not natural or easy to love your enemies. Yet this is what he challenges us to do. During his time as well as ours many of the faithful wanted to know “the rules” and to follow them. He simplified it and said love God and love your neighbor as yourself. Then to sting the “faithful” he tells us of the good Samaritan as a way of showing what it means to be neighbor and that even the least of these, my brothers, can do it (even when the Rabbi, failed to).
So he challenges us to be loving when we would chose not to and whenever in doubt if your choice is right, just ask, “Does this demonstrate love of God?”, “love of neighbor?” or “love of self?”
Thanks for the discussion.